<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 18 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25807</link>
    <description>On the death of a partner during the previous year, the firm was treated as dissolved rather than as a mere change in constitution under section 187 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The retrospective proviso to section 187 excluded cases where dissolution occurred on a partner&#039;s death from section 187(2)(a), so the post-death partnership constituted a fresh firm. As a result, the assessment had to be split into two separate assessments for the two distinct periods of the year, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 18 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25807</link>
      <description>On the death of a partner during the previous year, the firm was treated as dissolved rather than as a mere change in constitution under section 187 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The retrospective proviso to section 187 excluded cases where dissolution occurred on a partner&#039;s death from section 187(2)(a), so the post-death partnership constituted a fresh firm. As a result, the assessment had to be split into two separate assessments for the two distinct periods of the year, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>