<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 955 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409059</link>
    <description>Advances made through cheques are treated as falling outside the definition of loan under the Bengal Money-Lenders Act, 1940 because the statutory exclusion for advances on negotiable instruments applies, so the bar under section 13 does not operate. Documentary material showing disbursement in tranches, later interest payments, and TDS acknowledgements may establish a prima facie loan transaction and jural relationship, supporting interim protection under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC. Where the relief sought is temporary restraint rather than attachment before judgment, Order XXXVIII Rule 5 is not attracted, and injunction may issue if prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury are shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:04:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 955 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409059</link>
      <description>Advances made through cheques are treated as falling outside the definition of loan under the Bengal Money-Lenders Act, 1940 because the statutory exclusion for advances on negotiable instruments applies, so the bar under section 13 does not operate. Documentary material showing disbursement in tranches, later interest payments, and TDS acknowledgements may establish a prima facie loan transaction and jural relationship, supporting interim protection under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC. Where the relief sought is temporary restraint rather than attachment before judgment, Order XXXVIII Rule 5 is not attracted, and injunction may issue if prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury are shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>