<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 919 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409023</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant did not violate Regulations 11(d), 11(e), and 11(f) of the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2013. The decision to revoke the license, forfeit the security deposit, and impose a penalty was overturned. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:02:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 919 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409023</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant did not violate Regulations 11(d), 11(e), and 11(f) of the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2013. The decision to revoke the license, forfeit the security deposit, and impose a penalty was overturned. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>