<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 64 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25796</link>
    <description>On the death of a partner during the accounting year, a firm is treated as dissolved, rather than merely reconstituted, where there is no contract to the contrary. In that situation, section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, as qualified by the proviso inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, does not require a single assessment for the whole year. The factual position here showed dissolution on the partner&#039;s death and a fresh firm thereafter, so separate assessments for the pre-death and post-death periods were warranted. The assessee&#039;s position was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s contrary view rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 64 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25796</link>
      <description>On the death of a partner during the accounting year, a firm is treated as dissolved, rather than merely reconstituted, where there is no contract to the contrary. In that situation, section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, as qualified by the proviso inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, does not require a single assessment for the whole year. The factual position here showed dissolution on the partner&#039;s death and a fresh firm thereafter, so separate assessments for the pre-death and post-death periods were warranted. The assessee&#039;s position was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s contrary view rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>