<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 909 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409013</link>
    <description>A statutory authority must consider a pending representation and decide it on merits in accordance with law when its statutory power is invoked. The Madras HC noted that the petitioner&#039;s representation under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act had remained unattended, despite requiring consideration by the competent authority. It therefore directed the respondent to dispose of the representation within twelve weeks and pass a reasoned order on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2021 07:52:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 909 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409013</link>
      <description>A statutory authority must consider a pending representation and decide it on merits in accordance with law when its statutory power is invoked. The Madras HC noted that the petitioner&#039;s representation under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act had remained unattended, despite requiring consideration by the competent authority. It therefore directed the respondent to dispose of the representation within twelve weeks and pass a reasoned order on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>