<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 13 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25794</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the donation received by the assessee trust in the form of preference shares was intended to augment the trust&#039;s corpus and should not be considered as income for tax assessment purposes. Relying on precedents from various High Courts, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the donation amount from taxable accumulation. The decision aligned with the principle that donations specifically meant to enhance the trust&#039;s corpus should not be treated as income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:33:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 13 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25794</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the donation received by the assessee trust in the form of preference shares was intended to augment the trust&#039;s corpus and should not be considered as income for tax assessment purposes. Relying on precedents from various High Courts, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the donation amount from taxable accumulation. The decision aligned with the principle that donations specifically meant to enhance the trust&#039;s corpus should not be treated as income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>