<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 901 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409005</link>
    <description>IGST refund could not be denied solely on the basis of Circular No. 37/2018-Customs where excess duty drawback had been taken and later reversed with interest. The Tribunal noted that the circular had already been judicially interpreted as merely instructional and incapable of overriding the statute or determining refund entitlement. On that basis, the rejection of refund was found inconsistent with the settled legal position, the lower orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2022 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 901 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409005</link>
      <description>IGST refund could not be denied solely on the basis of Circular No. 37/2018-Customs where excess duty drawback had been taken and later reversed with interest. The Tribunal noted that the circular had already been judicially interpreted as merely instructional and incapable of overriding the statute or determining refund entitlement. On that basis, the rejection of refund was found inconsistent with the settled legal position, the lower orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>