<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 892 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments for AY 2005-06 and 2006-07 was invalid, quashed the reassessment orders, and allowed the appeals of the assessee. The addition of interest income on the arbitration award was deemed invalid, the disallowance of additional depreciation was baseless, and the charging of interest under Section 234D was unjustified. The appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2021 07:51:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 892 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments for AY 2005-06 and 2006-07 was invalid, quashed the reassessment orders, and allowed the appeals of the assessee. The addition of interest income on the arbitration award was deemed invalid, the disallowance of additional depreciation was baseless, and the charging of interest under Section 234D was unjustified. The appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>