<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2035 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments for the years 2009-10 and 2010-11 under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act was not valid due to vague reasons and lack of new material facts. As a result, the reassessment orders were quashed, and the appeals of the assessee were allowed. The Tribunal did not address the legitimacy of the trading additions for both years as the reassessment orders were invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2021 06:55:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2035 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessments for the years 2009-10 and 2010-11 under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act was not valid due to vague reasons and lack of new material facts. As a result, the reassessment orders were quashed, and the appeals of the assessee were allowed. The Tribunal did not address the legitimacy of the trading additions for both years as the reassessment orders were invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>