<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 888 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295949</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India permitted the petitioners&#039; advocate to remain present during interrogation at a visible distance, but not at an audible distance, as a limited safeguard during questioning. The writ petitions were allowed only to that extent and were otherwise disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2021 06:55:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 888 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295949</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India permitted the petitioners&#039; advocate to remain present during interrogation at a visible distance, but not at an audible distance, as a limited safeguard during questioning. The writ petitions were allowed only to that extent and were otherwise disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>