https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295934 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the bank, setting aside the auction sale due to inadequacy of price and prolonged litigation. The Court directed an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing fair compensation. The auction purchaser was ordered to pay a substantial sum to the bank and judgment debtor within three months. Failure to comply would lead to the sale being set aside. Each party was to bear its own costs, and the Court disposed of the appeals accordingly. en-us Thu, 01 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jun 2021 17:43:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295934 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the bank, setting aside the auction sale due to inadequacy of price and prolonged litigation. The Court directed an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing fair compensation. The auction purchaser was ordered to pay a substantial sum to the bank and judgment debtor within three months. Failure to comply would lead to the sale being set aside. Each party was to bear its own costs, and the Court disposed of the appeals accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295934