<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 392 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25786</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Income-tax Officer (TDS) lacks jurisdiction to demand additional tax from an employer after an employee has completed regular assessment and paid the tax in full. Relying on CIT v. Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. [1983] 140 ITR 818, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 392 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25786</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Income-tax Officer (TDS) lacks jurisdiction to demand additional tax from an employer after an employee has completed regular assessment and paid the tax in full. Relying on CIT v. Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. [1983] 140 ITR 818, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>