<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1218 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295929</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to re-evaluate the fair market value of the shares according to the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and not as per Rule 1D of the Wealth Tax Rules, which was no longer applicable. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in light of their observations and provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:43:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1218 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295929</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to re-evaluate the fair market value of the shares according to the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and not as per Rule 1D of the Wealth Tax Rules, which was no longer applicable. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration in light of their observations and provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>