<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 867 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408971</link>
    <description>The court interpreted Explanation-I to Section 153 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, focusing on the assessing officer&#039;s power to issue notices for assessment years. It clarified that the ten assessment years must be calculated from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year of the search. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the notice for the assessment year 2009-10 as it exceeded the ten-year limit, allowing the writ petition and closing the connected miscellaneous petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 07:14:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 867 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408971</link>
      <description>The court interpreted Explanation-I to Section 153 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, focusing on the assessing officer&#039;s power to issue notices for assessment years. It clarified that the ten assessment years must be calculated from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year of the search. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the notice for the assessment year 2009-10 as it exceeded the ten-year limit, allowing the writ petition and closing the connected miscellaneous petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>