https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408969 The court upheld the petitioner's challenge to revision orders, emphasizing the sales tax authority's duty to conduct independent inquiries separate from the excise department's findings. It directed the CESTAT to expedite the appeals within five months, holding the impugned orders in abeyance pending resolution. The court granted the petitioner the opportunity for interim relief and excluded the pendency period from limitation calculations. Ultimately, the court disposed of the writ petitions with specific directives for the CESTAT to resolve the appeals promptly and enforce the impugned orders based on the appeal outcomes. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:20:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408969 The court upheld the petitioner's challenge to revision orders, emphasizing the sales tax authority's duty to conduct independent inquiries separate from the excise department's findings. It directed the CESTAT to expedite the appeals within five months, holding the impugned orders in abeyance pending resolution. The court granted the petitioner the opportunity for interim relief and excluded the pendency period from limitation calculations. Ultimately, the court disposed of the writ petitions with specific directives for the CESTAT to resolve the appeals promptly and enforce the impugned orders based on the appeal outcomes. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408969