<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 9 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25782</link>
    <description>Where a firm was reconstituted during the accounting year on the death of a partner, the governing principle was that dissolution followed by succession by a firm with one or more common partners amounts only to a change in constitution under section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The income for the period before and after the reconstitution must therefore be aggregated and assessed in a single assessment for the entire accounting year. The contrary view based on earlier authority was rejected in light of the Full Bench ruling, and the direction for two separate assessments was held to be unjustified in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:00:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 9 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25782</link>
      <description>Where a firm was reconstituted during the accounting year on the death of a partner, the governing principle was that dissolution followed by succession by a firm with one or more common partners amounts only to a change in constitution under section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The income for the period before and after the reconstitution must therefore be aggregated and assessed in a single assessment for the entire accounting year. The contrary view based on earlier authority was rejected in light of the Full Bench ruling, and the direction for two separate assessments was held to be unjustified in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>