https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408960 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant for alleged evasion of excise duty through clandestine removal of finished goods. The Tribunal found the appellant's explanation regarding the shortage of goods due to discrepancies in recording burning loss plausible and criticized the Revenue for not considering the appellant's records. Emphasizing the lack of corroborative evidence for clandestine removal, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on 23.06.2021. en-us Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408960 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant for alleged evasion of excise duty through clandestine removal of finished goods. The Tribunal found the appellant's explanation regarding the shortage of goods due to discrepancies in recording burning loss plausible and criticized the Revenue for not considering the appellant's records. Emphasizing the lack of corroborative evidence for clandestine removal, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on 23.06.2021. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408960