https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408954 The appeal was allowed by the Member (Judicial) through remand, granting the appellant an opportunity to substantiate the CENVAT Credit claim with the necessary documentation before the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The Member emphasized that the appellant should not be deprived of the credit benefit under the Central Excise statute, as there was no dispute regarding the nature of input services received, despite procedural deficiencies in the documents. The adjudicating authority was directed to re-examine the certificate provided by the appellant and issue a new order within three months. en-us Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Nov 2021 18:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408954 The appeal was allowed by the Member (Judicial) through remand, granting the appellant an opportunity to substantiate the CENVAT Credit claim with the necessary documentation before the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision. The Member emphasized that the appellant should not be deprived of the credit benefit under the Central Excise statute, as there was no dispute regarding the nature of input services received, despite procedural deficiencies in the documents. The adjudicating authority was directed to re-examine the certificate provided by the appellant and issue a new order within three months. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408954