<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 843 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408947</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 45,00,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the assessee had provided sufficient evidence establishing the identity and creditworthiness of the companies and the genuineness of the transactions, contrary to the CIT(A)&#039;s affirmation of the AO&#039;s action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 07:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 843 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408947</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 45,00,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the assessee had provided sufficient evidence establishing the identity and creditworthiness of the companies and the genuineness of the transactions, contrary to the CIT(A)&#039;s affirmation of the AO&#039;s action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>