<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2069 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295920</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal for statistical purposes. Relief was granted on various grounds, such as capacity utilization adjustments, corporate services expenditure, sales commission expense, and employees&#039; provident fund remittance. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider certain aspects, including reworking the PLI of comparables and allowing specific expense claims based on legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 07:11:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2069 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295920</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal for statistical purposes. Relief was granted on various grounds, such as capacity utilization adjustments, corporate services expenditure, sales commission expense, and employees&#039; provident fund remittance. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider certain aspects, including reworking the PLI of comparables and allowing specific expense claims based on legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>