<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1803 - ITAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295918</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the Assessing Officer lacked the authority to impose late fees under section 234E through intimation issued under section 200A for defaults prior to 01.06.2015. The demand for late fees under section 234E was eliminated, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 07:11:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1803 - ITAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295918</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the Assessing Officer lacked the authority to impose late fees under section 234E through intimation issued under section 200A for defaults prior to 01.06.2015. The demand for late fees under section 234E was eliminated, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>