<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1599 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295925</link>
    <description>The SC concluded that an order for further investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC requires valid sanction. However, sanction under Section 19(1) P.C. Act is unnecessary if the public servant has been transferred from the post held during the alleged offence. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the HC&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1599 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295925</link>
      <description>The SC concluded that an order for further investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC requires valid sanction. However, sanction under Section 19(1) P.C. Act is unnecessary if the public servant has been transferred from the post held during the alleged offence. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the HC&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>