<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1469 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295924</link>
    <description>The Full Bench ruled that prospective accused persons are not necessary or proper parties in writ petitions under Article 226/227 seeking directions for FIR registration and investigation. The court emphasized that accused individuals do not have the right to be heard at the stage of FIR registration and investigation, as established by various Supreme Court judgments. The case was referred back to the appropriate Bench for further proceedings following this clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 07:11:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1469 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295924</link>
      <description>The Full Bench ruled that prospective accused persons are not necessary or proper parties in writ petitions under Article 226/227 seeking directions for FIR registration and investigation. The court emphasized that accused individuals do not have the right to be heard at the stage of FIR registration and investigation, as established by various Supreme Court judgments. The case was referred back to the appropriate Bench for further proceedings following this clarification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>