https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295923 The Court upheld the interim bail granted to the petitioner in a money laundering case despite opposition from the Enforcement Directorate. Factors such as the lack of prior arrest, asset seizure, absence of vulnerable witnesses, and early stage of the complaint were considered. The Court found no justification for remanding the petitioner to judicial custody under Section 45(1)(ii) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, ultimately maintaining the petitioner's bail status. en-us Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jun 2021 07:11:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295923 The Court upheld the interim bail granted to the petitioner in a money laundering case despite opposition from the Enforcement Directorate. Factors such as the lack of prior arrest, asset seizure, absence of vulnerable witnesses, and early stage of the complaint were considered. The Court found no justification for remanding the petitioner to judicial custody under Section 45(1)(ii) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, ultimately maintaining the petitioner's bail status. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295923