https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295913 Earlier court directions confined the inquiry to the Taj Heritage Corridor Project and verification of assets only within that limited context. A later FIR alleging disproportionate assets from 1995 onwards was treated as exceeding that mandate because no specific direction had authorised a separate criminal case on that issue. The Court held that the investigating agency could not equate the two matters, and that in the absence of lawful authority and required State consent under the applicable police establishment framework, the second FIR and the resulting investigation were without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed. en-us Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295913 Earlier court directions confined the inquiry to the Taj Heritage Corridor Project and verification of assets only within that limited context. A later FIR alleging disproportionate assets from 1995 onwards was treated as exceeding that mandate because no specific direction had authorised a separate criminal case on that issue. The Court held that the investigating agency could not equate the two matters, and that in the absence of lawful authority and required State consent under the applicable police establishment framework, the second FIR and the resulting investigation were without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295913