https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295912 The SC allowed the appeal and granted anticipatory bail to the appellants, husband and wife, accused of offenses under IPC Sections 504, 498A, 406, and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3/4. The Court emphasized that anticipatory bail should not be restricted by cognizance or charge sheet filing, maintaining its purpose to prevent undue harassment before trial. The bail was granted with conditions, including furnishing a self-bond and surety, highlighting that anticipatory bail orders should be of limited duration until the trial court has adequate material to decide on regular bail. en-us Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jul 2024 18:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295912 The SC allowed the appeal and granted anticipatory bail to the appellants, husband and wife, accused of offenses under IPC Sections 504, 498A, 406, and Dowry Prohibition Act Sections 3/4. The Court emphasized that anticipatory bail should not be restricted by cognizance or charge sheet filing, maintaining its purpose to prevent undue harassment before trial. The bail was granted with conditions, including furnishing a self-bond and surety, highlighting that anticipatory bail orders should be of limited duration until the trial court has adequate material to decide on regular bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295912