https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295911 The Court held that non-bailable warrants should not have been issued against the petitioner under sections 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as he was represented by counsel and not absconding. The Court also quashed the process under sections 82/83 of the Cr.P.C. against the petitioner, emphasizing the need to release the accused on bail in bailable offences. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Trial Court and seek regular bail. en-us Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:08:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295911 The Court held that non-bailable warrants should not have been issued against the petitioner under sections 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as he was represented by counsel and not absconding. The Court also quashed the process under sections 82/83 of the Cr.P.C. against the petitioner, emphasizing the need to release the accused on bail in bailable offences. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Trial Court and seek regular bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295911