<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 828 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408932</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in a GST prosecution because the investigation had been completed and the challan had been filed, making further custodial interrogation unnecessary. The Court also relied on earlier bail orders in similar matters and distinguished the State&#039;s cited order on the basis that it had been passed while investigation was still incomplete.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 828 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408932</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in a GST prosecution because the investigation had been completed and the challan had been filed, making further custodial interrogation unnecessary. The Court also relied on earlier bail orders in similar matters and distinguished the State&#039;s cited order on the basis that it had been passed while investigation was still incomplete.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>