<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 826 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408930</link>
    <description>The court upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, confirming the demand for GST totaling Rs. 91,20,399/-, recovery of interest, and imposition of penalties under Section 122 of the CGST Act, 2017. The appellant&#039;s arguments against penalties were dismissed, emphasizing the failure to deposit tax within the stipulated time. The appeal was rejected, and the appellant was instructed to comply with the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 826 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408930</link>
      <description>The court upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, confirming the demand for GST totaling Rs. 91,20,399/-, recovery of interest, and imposition of penalties under Section 122 of the CGST Act, 2017. The appellant&#039;s arguments against penalties were dismissed, emphasizing the failure to deposit tax within the stipulated time. The appeal was rejected, and the appellant was instructed to comply with the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>