<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 1005 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295910</link>
    <description>A decree on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC is permissible only where the admission is clear, unequivocal and positive; contested pleas that lease deeds were sham, that separate tenancies existed, and that rent was received separately raised factual disputes requiring evidence, so summary decree was unsustainable. The court further held that questions about contractual tenancy, the effect of separate rent receipts, the character of the lease deeds, and termination or expiry of tenancy were triable issues not fit for disposal on admission. As both suits involved the same parties, premises and lease arrangements, joint trial was appropriate to avoid inconsistent findings. The appeals succeeded, the decrees were set aside, and the suits were remanded for trial together.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:05:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 1005 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295910</link>
      <description>A decree on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC is permissible only where the admission is clear, unequivocal and positive; contested pleas that lease deeds were sham, that separate tenancies existed, and that rent was received separately raised factual disputes requiring evidence, so summary decree was unsustainable. The court further held that questions about contractual tenancy, the effect of separate rent receipts, the character of the lease deeds, and termination or expiry of tenancy were triable issues not fit for disposal on admission. As both suits involved the same parties, premises and lease arrangements, joint trial was appropriate to avoid inconsistent findings. The appeals succeeded, the decrees were set aside, and the suits were remanded for trial together.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>