https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295908 Framing of issues does not prevent a decree on admissions under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC where no further evidence is necessary. A prior final finding that the occupant was a trespasser and not a tenant could not be reopened in the later suit, so the respondent remained entitled to possession. Mesne profits were confined to the rent rate claimed by the appellant as tenancy rent. The decree was therefore maintained and the challenge failed. en-us Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:00:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295908 Framing of issues does not prevent a decree on admissions under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC where no further evidence is necessary. A prior final finding that the occupant was a trespasser and not a tenant could not be reopened in the later suit, so the respondent remained entitled to possession. Mesne profits were confined to the rent rate claimed by the appellant as tenancy rent. The decree was therefore maintained and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295908