https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295906 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to decree possession in favor of the respondents. The appellant's vague plea regarding the notice's legality was deemed insufficient. The court found the appellant's contention on the application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC to be unfounded, as the liberty to file afresh was expressly granted in the previous order. The court noted the lackadaisical approach in the prolonged resolution of the simple suit filed in 1992, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondents. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:37:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295906 The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision to decree possession in favor of the respondents. The appellant's vague plea regarding the notice's legality was deemed insufficient. The court found the appellant's contention on the application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC to be unfounded, as the liberty to file afresh was expressly granted in the previous order. The court noted the lackadaisical approach in the prolonged resolution of the simple suit filed in 1992, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295906