https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295906 A second application for judgment on admissions under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC remained maintainable because the earlier application had been dismissed as not pressed with express liberty to file a fresh one, and later framing of issues did not bar renewed consideration. On the merits, the landlord-tenant relationship, monthly rent, and receipt of the termination notice were admitted, while the tenant raised only a vague challenge to the notice's legality without particulars. Those admitted facts disclosed no triable issue, so the tenancy was treated as validly terminated and a decree for possession on admissions was justified. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:37:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295906 A second application for judgment on admissions under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC remained maintainable because the earlier application had been dismissed as not pressed with express liberty to file a fresh one, and later framing of issues did not bar renewed consideration. On the merits, the landlord-tenant relationship, monthly rent, and receipt of the termination notice were admitted, while the tenant raised only a vague challenge to the notice's legality without particulars. Those admitted facts disclosed no triable issue, so the tenancy was treated as validly terminated and a decree for possession on admissions was justified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295906