<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1434 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295905</link>
    <description>The court concluded that respondent No. 3 was entitled to judgment on admission, granting a preliminary decree for partition. Respondent No. 3 was awarded a 1/2 share in both properties. The appeal was partly allowed, and each party was responsible for their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1434 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295905</link>
      <description>The court concluded that respondent No. 3 was entitled to judgment on admission, granting a preliminary decree for partition. Respondent No. 3 was awarded a 1/2 share in both properties. The appeal was partly allowed, and each party was responsible for their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>