<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 808 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized aligning penalty proceedings with specific offenses, highlighting that penalties cannot be imposed solely based on additions made on an estimate basis without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:27:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 808 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized aligning penalty proceedings with specific offenses, highlighting that penalties cannot be imposed solely based on additions made on an estimate basis without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>