<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 801 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408905</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s application for pre-arrest bail, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation due to the serious allegations of economic offences with significant social ramifications. The court found that the PMLA Act applied, upheld the jurisdiction of the Special Court and CBI, and determined that anticipatory bail could impede effective investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 801 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408905</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s application for pre-arrest bail, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation due to the serious allegations of economic offences with significant social ramifications. The court found that the PMLA Act applied, upheld the jurisdiction of the Special Court and CBI, and determined that anticipatory bail could impede effective investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>