<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 798 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408902</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision to remand the matter back to the Designated Committee under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme for fresh orders after granting a personal hearing to the respondent. The Court found that all documents were not considered by the Committee, leading to a discrepancy in tax payment claimed by the petitioner. The writ appeal was disposed of, allowing the Committee to decide the matter within eight weeks as directed by the Single Judge, considering the closure of the Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 07:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 798 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408902</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Single Judge&#039;s decision to remand the matter back to the Designated Committee under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme for fresh orders after granting a personal hearing to the respondent. The Court found that all documents were not considered by the Committee, leading to a discrepancy in tax payment claimed by the petitioner. The writ appeal was disposed of, allowing the Committee to decide the matter within eight weeks as directed by the Single Judge, considering the closure of the Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>