https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408898 The court quashed the impugned orders and remitted the case back to the third respondent for a fresh determination of the correct classification of goods exported by the petitioner. The judgment highlighted errors in the initial dismissal of the Writ Petition, addressed the challenge against multiple orders, clarified the role of the testing authority in classification determination, and emphasized the need for a new classification based on CIPET's clarification. en-us Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:26:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408898 The court quashed the impugned orders and remitted the case back to the third respondent for a fresh determination of the correct classification of goods exported by the petitioner. The judgment highlighted errors in the initial dismissal of the Writ Petition, addressed the challenge against multiple orders, clarified the role of the testing authority in classification determination, and emphasized the need for a new classification based on CIPET's clarification. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408898