<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 782 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408886</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, restoring the customs broker license, returning the forfeited security deposit, and nullifying the penalty. The decision emphasized strict adherence to procedural requirements and the foundational role of the &#039;offence report&#039; in initiating revocation proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 782 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408886</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, restoring the customs broker license, returning the forfeited security deposit, and nullifying the penalty. The decision emphasized strict adherence to procedural requirements and the foundational role of the &#039;offence report&#039; in initiating revocation proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>