<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1348 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295896</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta held that the respondent in an appeal against a money decree can proceed with execution as the decree&#039;s operation was not stayed. The court rejected the applicant&#039;s request for an injunction, ruling it fell outside the appeal&#039;s scope.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 06:59:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1348 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295896</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta held that the respondent in an appeal against a money decree can proceed with execution as the decree&#039;s operation was not stayed. The court rejected the applicant&#039;s request for an injunction, ruling it fell outside the appeal&#039;s scope.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>