https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295893 The Court allowed xerox copies of documents as secondary evidence, emphasizing the need to establish the accuracy and probative value of such copies. It was held that xerox copies can be admitted if a foundation for secondary evidence is laid. Additionally, the Court accepted an affidavit affirming the loss of original documents during shifting as sufficient proof of loss. The requirement of notice under Section 66 of the Indian Evidence Act before admitting documents as secondary evidence was debated, with the petitioner arguing for its necessity, while the Court considered the probative value and circumstances surrounding the documents in question. en-us Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 06:59:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295893 The Court allowed xerox copies of documents as secondary evidence, emphasizing the need to establish the accuracy and probative value of such copies. It was held that xerox copies can be admitted if a foundation for secondary evidence is laid. Additionally, the Court accepted an affidavit affirming the loss of original documents during shifting as sufficient proof of loss. The requirement of notice under Section 66 of the Indian Evidence Act before admitting documents as secondary evidence was debated, with the petitioner arguing for its necessity, while the Court considered the probative value and circumstances surrounding the documents in question. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295893