https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295897 Service rendered in the Fish Farmers Development Agency was held not to qualify as pensionable service because the Agency was a registered society and autonomous body, not a State department, and the courts below found the employment to be under a non-pensionable establishment. The plea for parity with an earlier decree was also rejected because that decree was obtained without impleading the State, was unsustainable, and could not create a right through negative equality under Article 14. Concurrent factual findings were not shown to be perverse, and the denial of pensionary relief was left undisturbed. en-us Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Jun 2021 06:59:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295897 Service rendered in the Fish Farmers Development Agency was held not to qualify as pensionable service because the Agency was a registered society and autonomous body, not a State department, and the courts below found the employment to be under a non-pensionable establishment. The plea for parity with an earlier decree was also rejected because that decree was obtained without impleading the State, was unsustainable, and could not create a right through negative equality under Article 14. Concurrent factual findings were not shown to be perverse, and the denial of pensionary relief was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295897