<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 884 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295885</link>
    <description>A finding that a driver held a valid licence could not safely rest on a disputed photocopy when its genuineness was not admitted and that objection had not been examined by the HC. The omission to address this material contention required reconsideration, and the impugned judgment was set aside with the matter remitted to the HC for fresh decision after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 17:38:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 884 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295885</link>
      <description>A finding that a driver held a valid licence could not safely rest on a disputed photocopy when its genuineness was not admitted and that objection had not been examined by the HC. The omission to address this material contention required reconsideration, and the impugned judgment was set aside with the matter remitted to the HC for fresh decision after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>