https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295883 The Supreme Court determined that the compromise decree dated 03.04.1964 was final and enforceable without the need for further proceedings. Regarding the limitation for the execution proceeding, the Supreme Court held that the execution petition was indeed barred by limitation, as the decree became enforceable immediately and the time spent in subsequent legal actions could not extend the limitation period. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the High Court's decision was overturned, and the executing court's ruling was reinstated, with parties instructed to bear their own costs. en-us Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2021 17:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295883 The Supreme Court determined that the compromise decree dated 03.04.1964 was final and enforceable without the need for further proceedings. Regarding the limitation for the execution proceeding, the Supreme Court held that the execution petition was indeed barred by limitation, as the decree became enforceable immediately and the time spent in subsequent legal actions could not extend the limitation period. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the High Court's decision was overturned, and the executing court's ruling was reinstated, with parties instructed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295883