<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (5) TMI 200 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295882</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the court decreed the suit against all defendants, holding them jointly and severally liable for the amount decreed. The court emphasized that the decree directing payment by instalments suspends action against the sureties, and failure by the principal debtor to comply allows execution of the decree against all judgment-debtors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:25:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (5) TMI 200 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295882</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the court decreed the suit against all defendants, holding them jointly and severally liable for the amount decreed. The court emphasized that the decree directing payment by instalments suspends action against the sureties, and failure by the principal debtor to comply allows execution of the decree against all judgment-debtors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>