<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Legal Challenge on Reverse Charge: Misuse of Extended Limitation Period Without Concealment of Facts Raises Key Questions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58466</link>
    <description>Demand of service tax - reverse charge - revenue neutral issue - extended period of limitation - The extended period of limitation has wrongly been invoked by the Revenue in the present case because the appellant has not concealed any material fact - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:43:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:43:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Challenge on Reverse Charge: Misuse of Extended Limitation Period Without Concealment of Facts Raises Key Questions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58466</link>
      <description>Demand of service tax - reverse charge - revenue neutral issue - extended period of limitation - The extended period of limitation has wrongly been invoked by the Revenue in the present case because the appellant has not concealed any material fact - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:43:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>