<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rejects Photocopy of Dishonored Cheque as Evidence Due to Lack of Explanation on Original&#039;s Whereabouts.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58461</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - The petitioner failed to explain as to what were the circumstances under which photocopy was prepared and who was in possession of the original document at the time of photocopy being prepared. In view of these circumstances, this Court comes to conclusion that no foundation has been laid for leading secondary evidence in the shape of photocopy. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:38:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:38:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rejects Photocopy of Dishonored Cheque as Evidence Due to Lack of Explanation on Original&#039;s Whereabouts.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58461</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - The petitioner failed to explain as to what were the circumstances under which photocopy was prepared and who was in possession of the original document at the time of photocopy being prepared. In view of these circumstances, this Court comes to conclusion that no foundation has been laid for leading secondary evidence in the shape of photocopy. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:38:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>