<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 555 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295878</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the HC&#039;s judgment and reinstating the Trial Court&#039;s decision. The SC found the HC erred in overturning the acquittal, emphasizing that appellate courts should not interfere unless the judgment is perverse. The appellants were discharged from their bail bonds, reaffirming the Trial Court&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 555 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295878</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the HC&#039;s judgment and reinstating the Trial Court&#039;s decision. The SC found the HC erred in overturning the acquittal, emphasizing that appellate courts should not interfere unless the judgment is perverse. The appellants were discharged from their bail bonds, reaffirming the Trial Court&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>