https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295876 In an acquittal appeal under Section 378 CrPC, the appellate court may reappreciate the evidence fully, but interference is justified only when the acquittal is unreasonable, ignores admissible material, or is otherwise unsustainable on the record; if two reasonable views are possible, the trial court's plausible view should not be disturbed. On the FIR delay issue, prompt medical treatment, early recording of the complainant's statement, immediate registration, and timely forwarding through jurisdictional channels negated any claim of ante-timing or unexplained delay. The High Court's interference with acquittal was upheld and the conviction remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295876 In an acquittal appeal under Section 378 CrPC, the appellate court may reappreciate the evidence fully, but interference is justified only when the acquittal is unreasonable, ignores admissible material, or is otherwise unsustainable on the record; if two reasonable views are possible, the trial court's plausible view should not be disturbed. On the FIR delay issue, prompt medical treatment, early recording of the complainant's statement, immediate registration, and timely forwarding through jurisdictional channels negated any claim of ante-timing or unexplained delay. The High Court's interference with acquittal was upheld and the conviction remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295876