https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408880 A writ petition challenging a revisional order was held maintainable within the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction, even though the criminal procedure framework provides limited revisional and inherent remedies. On secondary evidence, a photocopy was found inadmissible because the statutory conditions were not strictly proved: there was no adequate foundation showing how the copy was prepared, that it was compared with the original, or that the original was lost or otherwise unavailable despite due diligence. The challenge to refusal of secondary evidence therefore failed and the petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:22:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408880 A writ petition challenging a revisional order was held maintainable within the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction, even though the criminal procedure framework provides limited revisional and inherent remedies. On secondary evidence, a photocopy was found inadmissible because the statutory conditions were not strictly proved: there was no adequate foundation showing how the copy was prepared, that it was compared with the original, or that the original was lost or otherwise unavailable despite due diligence. The challenge to refusal of secondary evidence therefore failed and the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408880