https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408880 The court upheld the maintainability of the writ petition (criminal) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, allowing the challenge against the order passed by the Sessions Judge. However, the court ruled against the admissibility of a photocopy as secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, due to insufficient evidence establishing its accuracy and authenticity. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower courts, with no costs imposed. en-us Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Jun 2021 10:22:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408880 The court upheld the maintainability of the writ petition (criminal) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, allowing the challenge against the order passed by the Sessions Judge. However, the court ruled against the admissibility of a photocopy as secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, due to insufficient evidence establishing its accuracy and authenticity. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower courts, with no costs imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408880