<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 764 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408868</link>
    <description>The HC of Patna upheld the penalty order under Section 20(1)(a) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, ruling it valid and not time-barred under Section 24. The court determined the applicable limitation period for penalty proceedings to be two years from the communication of the revisional order. The petition was dismissed, affirming the penalty and demand notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=647575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 764 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408868</link>
      <description>The HC of Patna upheld the penalty order under Section 20(1)(a) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, ruling it valid and not time-barred under Section 24. The court determined the applicable limitation period for penalty proceedings to be two years from the communication of the revisional order. The petition was dismissed, affirming the penalty and demand notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=408868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>